WEB¥ê¥ó¥¯½¸
| ¥á¥¤¥ó | ÅÐÏ¿¤¹¤ë | ¿Íµ¤¥µ¥¤¥È (top10) | ¹âɾ²Á¥µ¥¤¥È (top10) | ¤ª¤¹¤¹¤á¥µ¥¤¥È (0) | Áê¸ß¥ê¥ó¥¯¥µ¥¤¥È (0) |
| ¥«¥Æ¥´¥ê°ìÍ÷ | RSS/ATOM Âбþ¥µ¥¤¥È (6) | RSS/ATOM µ»ö (77113) | ¥é¥ó¥À¥à¥¸¥ã¥ó¥× |
RSS/ATOM µ»ö (77113)
¤³¤³¤Ëɽ¼¨¤µ¤ì¤Æ¤¤¤ë RSS/ATOM µ»ö¤ò RSS ¤È ATOM ¤ÇÇÛ¿®¤·¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£
| Âè263²óϫƯÀ¯ºö¿³µÄ²ñ¿¦¶È°ÂÄêʬ²Ê²ñϫƯÎϼûµëÀ©ÅÙÉô²ñ¡¡»ñÎÁ from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2024-8-16 14:56) |
|
|
| Âè264²óϫƯÀ¯ºö¿³µÄ²ñ¿¦¶È°ÂÄêʬ²Ê²ñϫƯÎϼûµëÀ©ÅÙÉô²ñ¡Ê³«ºÅ°ÆÆâ¡Ë from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2024-8-16 14:51) |
|
|
| Âè265²óϫƯÀ¯ºö¿³µÄ²ñ¿¦¶È°ÂÄêʬ²Ê²ñϫƯÎϼûµëÀ©ÅÙÉô²ñ¡¡µÄ»öÏ¿ from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2024-8-16 14:49) |
|
|
| £Î£Ð£ÅËô¤Ï²½³ØÊª¼Á¤Î¿³ººµÚ¤ÓÀ½Â¤Åù¤Îµ¬À©¤Ë´Ø¤¹¤ëˡΧ»Ü¹ÔÎáÂè¶å¾ò¤ËÄê¤á¤ëÀ½ÉʤǣΣУŤ¬»ÈÍѤµ¤ì¤Æ¤¤¤ë from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2024-8-16 14:40) |
|
|
| Ìô»ö¿³µÄ²ñ¡Ê·ì±Õ»ö¶ÈÉô²ñ¡Ê°ÂÁ´µ»½ÑÄ´ºº²ñ¡Ë¡Ë from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2024-8-16 14:00) |
|
|
| Ìô»ö¿³µÄ²ñ·ì±Õ»ö¶ÈÉô²ñÎáÏ£¶Ç¯ÅÙÂ裱²ó°ÂÁ´µ»½ÑÄ´ºº²ñµÚ¤ÓÂ裲²ó±¿±Ä°Ñ°÷²ñ¹çƱ²ñµÄ¡Ê¥Ú¡¼¥Ñ¡¼¥ì¥¹¡¦WebÊ from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2024-8-16 14:00) |
|
|
| Âè32²ó¥¥ã¥ê¥¢¥³¥ó¥µ¥ë¥¿¥ó¥ÈÅÐÏ¿À©ÅÙÅù¤Ë´Ø¤¹¤ë¸¡Æ¤²ñ¹¹¿·¹Ö½¬¡Êµ»Ç½¹Ö½¬¡Ëºî¶ÈÉô²ñ¤Î³«ºÅ¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2024-8-16 14:00) |
|
|
| Ìô»ö¿³µÄ²ñ¡¡°åÌôÉÊÂèÆóÉô²ñ¤ò³«ºÅ¤·¤Þ¤¹ from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2024-8-16 14:00) |
|
|
| Âè165²ó°å³ØÅª¸¡¾Úºî¶È¥°¥ë¡¼¥× from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2024-8-16 14:00) |
|
|
| Substructural Logics from Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2024-8-16 10:58) |
|
[Revised entry by Greg Restall on August 15, 2024.
Changes to: Main text, Bibliography]
Substructural logics are non-classical logics notable for the absence of one or more structural rules present in classical logic. Initial interest in substructural logics developed independently in the second half of the twentieth century, through considerations from philosophy (relevant logics), from linguistics (the Lambek calculus) and from the mathematics of proof theory (linear logic). Since the 1990s, these independent lines of inquiry have been understood to be different aspects of a unified field, and techniques...
|


