WEB¥ê¥ó¥¯½¸
| ¥á¥¤¥ó | ÅÐÏ¿¤¹¤ë | ¿Íµ¤¥µ¥¤¥È (top10) | ¹âɾ²Á¥µ¥¤¥È (top10) | ¤ª¤¹¤¹¤á¥µ¥¤¥È (0) | Áê¸ß¥ê¥ó¥¯¥µ¥¤¥È (0) |
| ¥«¥Æ¥´¥ê°ìÍ÷ | RSS/ATOM Âбþ¥µ¥¤¥È (6) | RSS/ATOM µ»ö (79686) | ¥é¥ó¥À¥à¥¸¥ã¥ó¥× |
RSS/ATOM µ»ö (79686)
¤³¤³¤Ëɽ¼¨¤µ¤ì¤Æ¤¤¤ë RSS/ATOM µ»ö¤ò RSS ¤È ATOM ¤ÇÇÛ¿®¤·¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£
| Human Enhancement from Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2025-11-14 13:36) |
|
[Revised entry by Daniel Moseley and Eric Juengst on November 13, 2025.
Changes to: Main text, Bibliography]
At first glance there does not seem to be anything philosophically problematic about human enhancement. Activities such as physical fitness routines, wearing eyeglasses, taking music lessons and meditation are routinely utilized for the goal of enhancing human capacities. But there are a cluster of debates in practical ethics, conventionally labeled as "the ethics of human enhancement", that do raise philosophical questions. These debates include clinicians' concerns about the limits of...
|
| ʸÉô²Ê³Ø¾Ê¹ñΩ¶µ°éÀ¯ºö¸¦µæ½êÈó¾ï¶Ð¿¦°÷¡Ê´ü´Ö¶È̳¿¦°÷¡ËºÎÍѤΤªÃΤ餻 from ʸÉô²Ê³Ø¾Ê¡¡¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2025-11-14 12:00) |
|
|
| ºÎÍѾðÊó¡Ê´ü´Ö¶È̳¿¦°÷(Âç¿Ã´±Ë¼¾ðÊó²½Ã´Åö»²»ö´±¼¼¡ËÊ罸¾ðÊó¡Ë from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2025-11-14 11:00) |
|
|
| 2025ǯ10·î¤ÎÃÏ¿Ì³èÆ°¤Îɾ²Á¤ò¸øÉ½¤·¤Þ¤·¤¿¡ÊÃÏ¿ÌÄ´ºº¸¦µæ¿ä¿ÊËÜÉôÃÏ¿ÌÄ´ºº°Ñ°÷²ñ¡Ë from ʸÉô²Ê³Ø¾Ê¡¡¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2025-11-14 11:00) |
|
|
| Ãæ¹âǯ¼Ô½ÄÃÇÄ´ºº¡ÊÃæ¹âǯ¼Ô¤ÎÀ¸³è¤Ë´Ø¤¹¤ë·Ñ³Ĵºº¡Ë¡§Àµ¸í¾ðÊó from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2025-11-14 10:00) |
|
|
| ÆÈΩ¹ÔÀ¯Ë¡¿Í¹ñΩÆÃÊ̻ٱ綵°éÁí¹ç¸¦µæ½êÍý»öŤθøÊç¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ from ʸÉô²Ê³Ø¾Ê¡¡¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2025-11-14 10:00) |
|
|
| ʸÉô²Ê³Ø¾ÊÂç¿Ã´±Ë¼Áí̳²Ý¹Êó¼¼ ¹ÊóÀïά¥¢¥É¥Ð¥¤¥¶¡¼¡ÊÈó¾ï¶Ð¿¦°÷(»þ´Ö¸ÛÍÑ¿¦°÷)¡ËºÎÍѤΤªÃΤ餻¡ÊÎáÏÂ8 from ʸÉô²Ê³Ø¾Ê¡¡¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2025-11-14 10:00) |
|
|
| ÆÈΩ¹ÔÀ¯Ë¡¿Í¤ÎÌò°÷¸øÊç¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ from ʸÉô²Ê³Ø¾Ê¡¡¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2025-11-14 10:00) |
|
|
| ¶µ°é²ÝÄøÉô²ñ¡¡»»¿ô¡¦¿ô³Ø¥ï¡¼¥¥ó¥°¥°¥ë¡¼¥×¡ÊÂè2²ó¡Ë¡¡ÇÛÉÕ»ñÎÁ from ʸÉô²Ê³Ø¾Ê¡¡¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2025-11-14 9:30) |
|
|
| ¹¹¿·¹Ö½¬¤Î¼õ¹Ö¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ¡Ê¥¥ã¥ê¥¢¥³¥ó¥µ¥ë¥¿¥ó¥È¹¹¿·¹Ö½¬°ìÍ÷¡Êµ»Ç½¹Ö½¬¡Ë¤ËÎáÏÂ7ǯ10·î»ØÄê¤Î¿·µ¬¹Ö½¬¤òÄ from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2025-11-14 9:30) |
|
|


