¥í¥°¥¤¥ó
¥æ¡¼¥¶¡¼Ì¾:

¥Ñ¥¹¥ï¡¼¥É:


¥Ñ¥¹¥ï¡¼¥Éʶ¼º

¥á¥¤¥ó¥á¥Ë¥å¡¼

logo

WEB¥ê¥ó¥¯½¸



  ¥á¥¤¥ó  |  ÅÐÏ¿¤¹¤ë  |  ¿Íµ¤¥µ¥¤¥È (top10)  |  ¹âɾ²Á¥µ¥¤¥È (top10)  |  ¤ª¤¹¤¹¤á¥µ¥¤¥È (0)  |  Áê¸ß¥ê¥ó¥¯¥µ¥¤¥È (0)  

  ¥«¥Æ¥´¥ê°ìÍ÷  |  RSS/ATOM Âбþ¥µ¥¤¥È (6)  |  RSS/ATOM µ­»ö (75238)  |  ¥é¥ó¥À¥à¥¸¥ã¥ó¥×  

RSS/ATOM µ­»ö (75238)

¤³¤³¤Ëɽ¼¨¤µ¤ì¤Æ¤¤¤ë RSS/ATOM µ­»ö¤ò RSS ¤È ATOM ¤ÇÇÛ¿®¤·¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£


rss  atom 

Âè40²ó´ÉÍý±ÉÍܻιñ²È»î¸³¤Î»Ü¹Ô¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ  from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó  (2025-6-19 10:00) 

Conservation Biology  from Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy  (2025-6-19 8:21) 
[Revised entry by Jay Odenbaugh on June 18, 2025. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] One way of conceptualizing the structure of a science is that at any time it contains ontologies, theories, and values (Kuhn 1962; Lakatos 1976; Laudan 1978, 1986). In this entry, we explore questions regarding the ontology, theories, and values central to conservation biology. First, conservation biology as a discipline has expended a great deal of intellectual effort in articulating exactly what it is that they study and has settled on biodiversity as the answer. However, there is a debate concerning what...
¸¦µæ´Ä¶­´ðÈ×Éô²ñ¡ÊÂè124²ó¡Ë¤Î³«ºÅ¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ  from ʸÉô²Ê³Ø¾Ê¡¡¿·Ãå¾ðÊó  (2025-6-18 20:46) 

ÎáÏ£·Ç¯ÅÙ¡Ö°åÎÅÄÌÌõ¼Ô¡¢³°¹ñ¿Í´µ¼Ô¼õÆþ¤ì°åÎÅ¥³¡¼¥Ç¥£¥Í¡¼¥¿¡¼ÇÛÃÖÅù»Ù±ç»ö¶È¡×¤ÎÊä½õÂоݰåÎŵ¡´Ø¤Î¸øÊç  from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó  (2025-6-18 16:46) 

¹ñΩ¸¦µæ³«È¯Ë¡¿Í¿³µÄ²ñ ³¤Íθ¦µæ³«È¯µ¡¹½Éô²ñ¡ÊÂè35²ó¡Ë¤Î³«ºÅ¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ  from ʸÉô²Ê³Ø¾Ê¡¡¿·Ãå¾ðÊó  (2025-6-18 15:00) 

À¸Ì¿²Ê³Ø¡¦°å³Ø·Ï¸¦µæÅù¤Ë¤ª¤±¤ë¸Ä¿Í¾ðÊó¤Î¼è°·¤¤Åù¤Ë´Ø¤¹¤ë¹çƱ²ñµÄ¡ÊÎáÏÂ7ǯ2·î¡Á¡Ë¡ÊÂè4²ó¡Ë ¤ò³«ºÅ¤·¤Þ  from ʸÉô²Ê³Ø¾Ê¡¡¿·Ãå¾ðÊó  (2025-6-18 14:00) 

¡ÖÂè22²óϫƯÀ¯ºö¿³µÄ²ñ¡¡¿¦¶È°ÂÄêʬ²Ê²ñ¡¡¸ÛÍѴĶ­¡¦¶ÑÅùʬ²Ê²ñ¡¡Æ±°ìϫƯƱ°ìĶâÉô²ñ¡×¡Ê¥Ú¡¼¥Ñ¡¼¥ì¥¹¡Ë  from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó  (2025-6-18 14:00) 

Âè41²óÆÃÄêÀÐÌÊÈï³²·úÀß¶È̳ϫƯ¼ÔÅùǧÄ꿳ºº²ñ¡¡³«ºÅ°ÆÆâ  from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó  (2025-6-18 14:00) 

Âè30²ó¹ñºÝ¸¶»ÒÎϵ¡´Ø¡ÊIAEA¡Ë³ËÍ»¹ç¥¨¥Í¥ë¥®¡¼²ñµÄ¡ÊFEC¡Ë¥Ý¥¹¥È¡¦¥Ç¥Ã¥É¥é¥¤¥óÅê¹ÆÏÀʸµÚ¤Ó²ñµÄ»²²Ã¼Ô¤ÎÊ  from ʸÉô²Ê³Ø¾Ê¡¡¿·Ãå¾ðÊó  (2025-6-18 11:03) 

Moore¡Çs Moral Philosophy  from Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy  (2025-6-18 9:31) 
[Revised entry by Thomas Hurka on June 17, 2025. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] G.E. Moore's Principia Ethica of 1903 is often considered a revolutionary work that set a new agenda for 20th-century ethics. This historical view is, however, somewhat overstated. In metaethics Moore's non-naturalist realism was close to that defended by Henry Sidgwick and other late 19th-century philosophers such as Hastings Rashdall, Franz Brentano, and J.M.E. McTaggart; in normative ethics his ideal consequentialism likewise echoed views of Rashdall, Brentano, and...



« [1] 308 309 310 311 312 (313) 314 315 316 317 318 [7524] » 
ÂçëÂç³Ø´ØÏ¢¤Î¥Û¡¼¥à¥Ú¡¼¥¸

Powered by XOOPS Cube 2.1© 2001-2006 XOOPS Cube Project