WEB¥ê¥ó¥¯½¸
| ¥á¥¤¥ó | ÅÐÏ¿¤¹¤ë | ¿Íµ¤¥µ¥¤¥È (top10) | ¹âɾ²Á¥µ¥¤¥È (top10) | ¤ª¤¹¤¹¤á¥µ¥¤¥È (0) | Áê¸ß¥ê¥ó¥¯¥µ¥¤¥È (0) |
| ¥«¥Æ¥´¥ê°ìÍ÷ | RSS/ATOM Âбþ¥µ¥¤¥È (6) | RSS/ATOM µ»ö (78399) | ¥é¥ó¥À¥à¥¸¥ã¥ó¥× |
RSS/ATOM µ»ö (78399)
¤³¤³¤Ëɽ¼¨¤µ¤ì¤Æ¤¤¤ë RSS/ATOM µ»ö¤ò RSS ¤È ATOM ¤ÇÇÛ¿®¤·¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£
| ÎáÏ£·Ç¯ÅÙÂ裴²ó¡ÖÀÐÌʤ˷¸¤ë¼ÀɤζÈ̳¾å³°¤Ë´Ø¤¹¤ë¸¡Æ¤²ñ¡×¤ò³«ºÅ¤·¤Þ¤¹ from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2025-8-1 14:00) |
|
|
| ÀïË×¼Ô°ÖÎî»ö¶È¤Î¤ªÃΤ餻¡ÊÎáÏ£·Ç¯£¸·î¼Â»Üʬ¡Ë from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2025-8-1 14:00) |
|
|
| ¥í¥·¥¢Ï¢Ë®À¯ÉÜÅù¤«¤éÄ󶡤µ¤ì¤¿ÍÞα¼Ô¤Ë´Ø¤¹¤ë»ñÎÁ¤òÆüËܦ¤Î»ñÎÁ¤È¾È¹ç¤·¡¢ÍÞÎ±Ãæ¤Ë»àË´¤·¤¿¼Ô¤Î¸Ä¿Í¤òÆÃ from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2025-8-1 14:00) |
|
|
| ÎáÏ£·Ç¯ÅÙ ¡Ö¤³¤É¤â²â¤¬´Ø¸«³Ø¥Ç¡¼¡×¤Î¾ÜºÙ¤¬·è¤Þ¤ê¤Þ¤·¤¿ from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2025-8-1 13:58) |
|
|
| ¡Ö¥È¥«¥éÎóÅç¶á³¤¤Ë¤ª¤¤¤Æ·Ñ³¤¹¤ëÃÏ¿Ì³èÆ°¤Ë´Ø¤¹¤ëÁí¹çÄ´ºº¡×¤ËÂФ·¤Æ¡¢²Ê³Ø¸¦µæÈñ½õÀ®»ö¶È ¡ÊÆÃÊ̸¦µæÂ¥¿ from ʸÉô²Ê³Ø¾Ê¡¡¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2025-8-1 12:00) |
|
|
| ºÎÍѾðÊó¡Ê´ü´Ö¶È̳¿¦°÷¡ÊÂç¿Ã´±Ë¼¹ñºÝ²Ý¡ËÊ罸¾ðÊó from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2025-8-1 12:00) |
|
|
| Â裳£²²ó¸üÀ¸²Ê³Ø¿³µÄ²ñ¤¬¤óÅÐÏ¿Éô²ñ¡Ê»ñÎÁ¡Ë from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2025-8-1 11:38) |
|
|
| The History of Utilitarianism from Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2025-8-1 11:31) |
|
[Revised entry by Julia Driver on July 31, 2025.
Changes to: Main text, Bibliography]
Utilitarianism is one of the most powerful and persuasive approaches to normative ethics in the history of philosophy. The approach is a species of consequentialism, which holds that the moral quality of an action or policy is entirely a function of its consequences, or the value produced by the action or policy. This approach is contrasted with other approaches to moral evaluation which either entirely eschew a consideration of consequences or view an action's production of value as simply one element amongst...
|
| ¹ñΩÀľ¯Ç¯¶µ°é»ÜÀߤο¶¶½Êýºö¤Ë´Ø¤¹¤ë¸¡Æ¤²ñ¡ÊÂè7²ó¡ËÇÛÉÛ»ñÎÁ from ʸÉô²Ê³Ø¾Ê¡¡¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2025-8-1 10:00) |
|
|
| Âè38²ó¼Ò²ñÊ¡»ã»Î¹ñ²È»î¸³¤Î»Ü¹Ô¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2025-8-1 10:00) |
|
|


