WEB¥ê¥ó¥¯½¸
¥á¥¤¥ó | ÅÐÏ¿¤¹¤ë | ¿Íµ¤¥µ¥¤¥È (top10) | ¹âɾ²Á¥µ¥¤¥È (top10) | ¤ª¤¹¤¹¤á¥µ¥¤¥È (0) | Áê¸ß¥ê¥ó¥¯¥µ¥¤¥È (0) |
¥«¥Æ¥´¥ê°ìÍ÷ | RSS/ATOM Âбþ¥µ¥¤¥È (6) | RSS/ATOM µ»ö (74435) | ¥é¥ó¥À¥à¥¸¥ã¥ó¥× |
RSS/ATOM µ»ö (74435)
¤³¤³¤Ëɽ¼¨¤µ¤ì¤Æ¤¤¤ë RSS/ATOM µ»ö¤ò RSS ¤È ATOM ¤ÇÇÛ¿®¤·¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£


Mechanisms in Science from Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2024-8-2 6:39) |
[Revised entry by Carl Craver, James Tabery, and Phyllis Illari on August 1, 2024.
Changes to: Main text, Bibliography, notes.html]
The concept of mechanism has been an important organizing principle in science and philosophy since at least the early modern period (Dijksterhuis 1950 [1961]; Boas 1952). The nature of that organizing principle, and precisely how it scaffolds the organization of material knowledge, has changed considerably over time. In late twentieth century philosophy of science, the term "mechanism" came to stand for a kind of theoretical structure according to which some capacity or behavior of a whole or an endstate of a process is...
|
ÎáÏ£¶Ç¯ ̱´Ö¼çÍ×´ë¶È½Õµ¨Ä¾夲Í׵ᡦÂÅ·ë¾õ¶·¤ò¸øÉ½¤·¤Þ¤¹ from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2024-8-2 0:00) |
|
½Å¾ÉÇ®À·ì¾®Èĸº¾¯¾É¸õ·²¡ÊSFTS¡Ë¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2024-8-2 0:00) |
|
Â裱£¶²ó¡¡À®Ç¯¸å¸«À©ÅÙÍøÍÑÂ¥¿ÊÀìÌç²È²ñµÄ¡¡»ñÎÁ from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2024-8-1 22:00) |
|
²½³ØÊª¼Á¤Î¿³ººµÚ¤ÓÀ½Â¤Åù¤Îµ¬À©¤Ë´Ø¤¹¤ëˡΧ¤Ë¤ª¤±¤ë¥Ú¥ë¥Õ¥ë¥ª¥í¥Ø¥¥µ¥ó¥¹¥ë¥Û¥ó»À¡ÊPFHxS¡Ë´ØÏ¢Êª¼Á¤Ë· from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2024-8-1 20:23) |
|
Ãæ±û¼Ò²ñÊݸ±°åÎŶ¨µÄ²ñ¤Î³«ºÅ¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2024-8-1 19:59) |
|
¾®ÎÓÀ½Ìô³ô¼°²ñ¼Ò¤«¤é¤ÎÊó¹ð¤Ë·¸¤ëÉÔÈ÷¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ¡ÊºÆÅÀ¸¡·ë²Ì¡Ë from ¸üÀ¸Ï«Æ¯¾Ê¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2024-8-1 18:30) |
|
Âè132²óÀ¸³¶³Ø½¬Ê¬²Ê²ñ¤ÎµÄ»öÏ¿¤ò·ÇºÜÃפ·¤Þ¤·¤¿¡£ from ʸÉô²Ê³Ø¾Ê¡¡¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2024-8-1 18:11) |
|
ÎáÏÂ6ǯÅÙʸÉô²Ê³Ø¾Ê¤³¤É¤â²â¤¬´Ø¸«³Ø¥Ç¡¼ from ʸÉô²Ê³Ø¾Ê¡¡¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2024-8-1 18:00) |
|
ʸÉô²Ê³Ø¾Ê¸¦µæ³«È¯¶É¸¶»ÒÎÏ»³²Çå½þʶÁèϲòÃç²ð¼¼Èó¾ï¶Ð¿¦°÷¡Ê´ü´Ö¶È̳¿¦°÷¡ËºÎÍѤΤªÃΤ餻 from ʸÉô²Ê³Ø¾Ê¡¡¿·Ãå¾ðÊó (2024-8-1 18:00) |
|